May 25, 2013

Week 13 Picks

A 4-3 week in week 12 means we are clicking along at a 37-36 on the year and 8-4 picks of the week.  Maybe you noticed no pick in the Clemson – South Carolina game.  There’s a reason for that.  My analysis (more on that tomorrow), done without the benefit of the spread, came out exactly the same as the spread, therefore we went with the over/under for the game.

The Georgia – Georgia Tech game is an interesting one to me, as is the Clemson – South Carolina game for obvious reasons – Clemson and Georgia have championship games next week, while their rivals don’t.

Favorite Dog Spread O/U
South Carolina (H) Clemson (A) 4 50
Texas A&M (H) Texas (A)
-7.5 53.5
LSU (H) Arkansas (A)
+12 52
Georgia (A) Georgia Tech (H)
+6 54.5
Wisconsin (H) Penn State (A)
-14.5 49
Alabama (A)
Auburn (H)
+21 47
Florida State (A)
Florida (H)
+2.5 45
Virginia Tech (A)
Virginia (H)
+5 67

Pick of the week: Take the Over 52 in the LSU – Arkansas game.

Week 11 Picks

After 10 weeks we sit at 30-30 overall and 7-3 in picks of the week.  Having a hard time understanding Virginia Tech being favored in Atlanta against Georgia Tech.

Favorite Dog Spread O/U
Clemson (H) Wake Forest (A) +16.5 60.5
Virginia Tech (A) Georgia Tech (H) +1 49.5
Florida State (H) Miami (A)
+9 50.5
South Carolina (H) Florida (A)
+3.5 39.5
Stanford (H) Oregon (A)
-3.5 66

Pick of the week: Take the Over 49.5 in the Virginia Tech-Georgia Tech game.

Sunday Morning Leftovers #9

Thoughts and ramblings accumulated while watching Clemson go down in flames in Atlanta.

  • Andre Ellington is perhaps the most important player on the Clemson team.  If that wasn’t apparent before Saturday, it should be now.  
  • In discussing the ways in which Georgia Tech could pull the upset on Friday the first thing out of my mouth was “Turnovers”. 
  • The other thing I mentioned was Georgia Tech averaged about 25 yards per completion.  Tech only averaged 15 per completion Saturday, but at least one of them was huge.
  • The thing to remember about the Morris offense is that, as we told you back in the summer, it lends itself to winning big if things go well and losing big if they don’t.
  • I was planning a post this coming week on how I think the Clemson defense was being labeled unfairly.  Nevermind.
  • I noticed a difference in the Clemson team during the week.  Swinney sounded exhausted and the players were giving off a different vibe than I saw in previous weeks.
  • This is a different team on the road than at home.  I know the Tigers won their first two on the road, but think about those games and how the offense has performed at home and on the road so far.
  • The Tigers could have used the off week earlier in the season than after game 9, but that’s no excuse as the Jackets were also playing their 9th game.  Just something to file away for the schedule maker in the future.
  • If you would have told any Clemson fan before the season that you would be 8-1 and in first place in the division after 9 games, they would have taken it.
  • The main goals are still out there for this team to accomplish - division, ACC and BCS.

Much like the team, we’ll be taking some time off this week to regroup.  We’ll have a couple of posts, including our award-winning podcast, but not the daily dose that you’ve become accustomed to.  Next week we’ll be back to the normal schedule.

 

ACC Third Down Conversions

ACC 3rd Down D 102911

Interesting that Georgia Tech leads the ACC in third down conversions on offense, but their improved defense is having trouble stopping the opponents. Meanwhile, Clemson is third on offense and 4th on defense in third down situations.

There’s been a lot of chatter about Tech going for it on fourth down. Truth is they’ve only gone for it 12 times on 4th down in 8 games or 1.5 times per game and only 4 times more than Clemson has. I don’t know if it will be a factor today or not, but I think the theory that Tech goes for it on 4th down a bit overblown.

Game Analysis: Clemson vs. Georgia Tech

Please disregard this analysis.  It isn’t often I say that, but the Georgia Tech offense is so unusual that typical analysis doesn’t apply.

It’s easy to say that this Yellow Jacket team racked up lots of points and big yards against a weak schedule and has come back to earth against ACC competition.  That appears to be a valid point as Tech’s 25.8 points per game against ACC competition pales in comparison to their 59.3 points per game in non-conference.  Add in the fact that the defense of the 5 ACC teams the Jackets have played range anywhere from middling to terrible is another clue.

But Tech remains dangerous, nonetheless.

There is something in the numbers and in my head that suggest this game could be an issue for Clemson.  Call me pessimistic.  Tell me I’m worried about the fall from grace that everyone is waiting for.  Call me crazy.

I spent a lot of time on this week’s podcast and also some time in writing defending the Clemson defense this week.  Simply looking at a box score doesn’t tell you how well the Clemson defense played last week.  Sure they gave up two long TD passes, but that was about it until the starters were resting comfortably on the sidelines and the kickoff team decided to become spectators.

Meantime the Tech defense is better than one might think, giving up only 341 yards and 24.13 points per game.  Again you can question the competition (I do), but they are called averages for a reason.  The Jackets strength of schedule is only 19 places behind Clemson, so comparing the two is not out of the question.

Clemson has played two road games and had issues in both, despite winning.  The offense sputtered (I know, I know, the weather) in Blacksburg and then fell way behind in College Park to a bad Maryland team before rallying.

For all the talk about Georgia Tech going for it on fourth down the Jackets have only 12 fourth down attempts in 8 games (1.5 attempts per game).  Clemson’s tried 8.  It hasn’t been that big of a difference.

While the numbers tell me one story, my head tells me another.  The numbers say Georgia Tech will cover the 3 ½ point spread and perhaps actually win the game.  My head tells me Clemson is much better than this Yellow Jacket team. 

The question is, is this the week of the clunker for Clemson or did the Tigers escape the clunker at Maryland?  Clemson has covered the spread against every FBS team this year and that streak has to end sometime.  Will it be this week?  Next week?  Next year?  Who knows.

On the field, questions have abounded about the Georgia Tech offensive line and the decisions made by quarterback Tevin Washington.

Has the ACC caught up with the Tech offense?  Maybe in part, but my guess is that Paul Johnson has some tricks up his sleeve this week, not to mention playing at home and being desperate as a loss would be Tech’s third in the ACC.

Teams, even good ones, don’t go undefeated for a reason.  It’s hard.  Not because the other team is better necessarily, but because it’s hard to play well every week (hello,Oklahoma!) and sometimes the other team plays out of their mind. 

I can see a scenario where Clemson blows Georgia Tech out.  I can see a scenario where Tech wins.  Many different scenarios have played out in my mind this week.  Which one plays out on Saturday?  Your guess is as good as mine. 

Just know this:  The model I use to assist in predicting games is least reliable with teams that are one-dimensional (either passing or running) than more balanced teams and for this reason I have very little confidence in this prediction.

Georgia Tech 41 Clemson 36

Week 9 Picks

Another 2-4 week pretty much means that you shouldn’t take anything from this post, except who not to take.  A slump is an understatement at this point and last week it even crept into the pick of the week.  Onward I trudge towards the inevitable.

Point spread winners are bolded. Entertainment purposes only.

Favorite Dog Spread O/U
Clemson (A) Georgia Tech (H) +3.5 63.5
Oklahoma St. (H) Baylor (A) +14 79
Oklahoma (A) Kansas State (H) +13.5 58.5
Georgia (N) Florida (N) -3 49
Stanford (A) Southern Cal (H) -7.5 60

Pick of the week: Take the Over 58.5 in the Oklahoma vs. Kansas State game.

Week 8 Picks

At this point perhaps I should just give my pick of the week and forget the rest after an atrocious 2-4 record puts me at 23-23 on the season, but 6-1 in picks of the week.  This week we pick the Tigers (details coming on Friday) to barely cover the 10.5 points they are laying.

Point spread winners are bolded. Entertainment purposes only.

Favorite Dog Spread O/U
Clemson (H) North Carolina (A) -10.5 58
Oklahoma St. (A) Missouri (H) +6 68.5
Miami, FL (H) Georgia Tech (A) +2.5 62
Notre Dame (H) Southern Cal (A) +9 57.5
Wisconsin (A) Michigan State (H) -8.5 49

Pick of the week: Take the Over 62 in the Georgia Tech vs. Miami, FL game.

Predicting College Baseball Regional Winners

To begin our look at the regionals lets start with those that I think the 1 seed wins (national seed in parenthesis):

1. Charlottesville – Virginia (1)
2. Tallahassee – Florida State (5)
3. Clemson – Clemson
4. Columbia – South Carolina (4)
5. Gainesville – Florida (2)
6. Atlanta – Georgia Tech
7. Tempe – Arizona State
8. Austin – Texas (7)
9. Nashville – Vanderbilt (6)
10. Corvallis – Oregon State
11. Chapel Hill – North Carolina (3)

That leaves 5 regionals where I think that the #1 seed doesn’t win, including one national seed.

Starting in Los Angeles, I’ll take Fresno State over UCLA. UCLA has the nations fourth ranked pitching ERA, but similar to Texas has batting and slugging rankings in the 200s.

Team Fielding ERA Batting Slugging SoS
Fresno State 34 12 54 14 84
UCLA 23 4 243 233 32

 

However, a difference can be seen in the records – Texas has lost 15 games and UCLA 22. If you read this space regularly you know that I think Fresno is a dark horse contender for the national title based on my tried and true algorithm, with the notable exception of their strength of schedule. Both teams have pitching and play excellent defense, but Fresno has far and away better batting and slugging statistics.

In Fort Worth, Oklahoma will take down TCU. The Sooners have solid advantages in fielding, ERA and batting, not to mention strength of schedule and the vaunted TCU pitching staff is struggling.

Team Fielding ERA Batting Slugging SoS
Oklahoma 29 20 10 20 47
TCU 139 26 22 10 86

 

In Houston, I was mildly surprised that Rice was a top 8 seed, but the Owls got a tough draw in a California team that has occasionally appeared in our national contender team list during the year.

Team Fielding ERA Batting Slugging SoS
California 10 14 130 123 46
Rice 158 29 125 196 14

 

I’ll take a Cal team that has a fielding ranking of 10 and an ERA ranking of 14. This is not your typical pitching and power Rice team of years past as their 196th slugging ranking shows.

Texas A&M arguably has the biggest gripe over not being a top 8 seed, having tied for the Big 12 regular season title and won the conference tournament.

Team Fielding ERA Batting Slugging SoS
Arizona 15 58 3 26 41
Texas A&M 20 10 93 120 12

 

A&M losing John Stilson (5-2, 1.68) is the difference for me and I think this swings the regional to Arizona even though A&M has a talented staff even without Stilson and the Arizona pitching staff has been so so.

In Fullerton, the only advantage the Titans have over Stanford is pitching (yes, that’s a big one), but the Cardinal’s advantage in every other category outweighs that one. I’m taking Stanford.

Team Fielding ERA Batting Slugging SoS
Stanford 98 47 61 99 24
Cal State Fullerton 133 13 121 169 58

Dissecting 25-5

How does a team go from a 14-12 huge disappointment to a 39-17 juggernaut on the verge of hosting a regional?  You hit better, field better and most of all pitch better.  And by the way, the scheduling gods look favorably upon you.

Sure the Tigers won crucial series against Georgia Tech and Florida State, but they also played Boston College and Gardner-Webb (3 times each), Furman and Western Carolina (twice each) and Presbyterian and Davidson (once each). 

And while the Seminoles and Yellow Jackets are formidable opponents, they aren’t Virginia, North Carolina or South Carolina, teams that the Tigers are a combined 1-8 against.

Yet, looking inside the numbers shows definite improvement over the last 30 games by the Tigers as the chart below shows, most notably in ERA which was 1.31 runs per game below the pre-streak numbers.  In addition, the .978 fielding percentage the Tigers have maintained over those 30 games is in the range of a top 10 team as is the 2.52 ERA over that period.  Impressive stuff.

  During 14-12 During 25-5
Fielding .958 .978
ERA 3.83 2.52
Batting .307 .330


Hope springs eternal for Tiger fans and last years run to the final four of college baseball showed anything can happen, but the odds are long against a repeat performance.  Why?  Gardner-Webb, Davidson, Boston College, Furman and Western Carolina aren’t going to be on the schedule going forward.  Also the huge break that the Tigers received last year with Georgia Tech losing the regional at home, is not likely to happen again (or benefit the Tigers if it does) and ironically it could be the games the Tigers lost in the streak (Maryland, Wake Forest and Virginia Tech) that keep them from hosting a regional and/or super regional. 

  During 14-12 During 25-5
ACC 4-8 13-5
Non-Conf 10-4 12-0


The Tigers have proven they can take on the Florida States and Georgia Techs of the college baseball world and hold their own either at home or on the road.  The question is have they improved enough to play with the Virginias, North Carolinas and South Carolinas?

A look at Clemson baseball (and it ain’t pretty)

Twenty six games into the 2011 season the once third ranked Clemson Tiger baseball teams finds itself with a 14-12 record and an ugly 4-8 ACC mark, which is tied for 4th in Atlantic Division. 
 
The good news is Maryland, Virginia Tech, Wake Forest and Boston College are still ahead on the schedule.  The bad news is so are Georgia Tech and Florida State.
 
The worse news is that this is a horrible fielding team.  Not bad.  Horrible.  As of April 3 the Tigers are ranked 193rd in defense (of 291 teams ranked), which puts them in the bottom 32% of defensive teams (fielding percentage-wise).
 
Unbelievably, I still hear from some fans and media that offense is a problem for this team.  While it is true that the Tigers have been shut out twice in 26 games, overall the team is ranked 23rd in batting average, 45th in slugging and 30th is scoring.  For the most part the issue has been fielding and relief pitching.
 
This is a team that has lost all six games to Virginia and North Carolina, despite having a lead at some point in 5 of those games.  In those 6 games the Tigers made 12 errors and gave up 16 unearned runs.
 
True, the Tigers pitching has been mediocre (88th nationally), but time after time defense has let the Tigers down.  In the last 9 years only one team has won the CWS with a fielding ranking of lower than 22. 
 
First things first, though.  This team needs to be concerned about making the NCAA field.  My gut (and the schedule) says this team has 20+ wins left in them and will finish with 34+ wins and sneak in the tourney (a couple wins in the ACC tourney won’t hurt), but won’t host a regional or, barring a miracle for the second straight year, host a super regional.