May 18, 2013

2013 Returning Experience: Running Back

Rod McDowell

Previously Posted Positions: Quarterback Offensive Line

Perhaps no skill position has more questions surrounding it than running back.

Andre Ellington departs after two + year’s worth of starts and over 1,800 career snaps leaving Rod McDowell as the Tigers most experienced back.

Entering his senior season McDowell has been a career backup, but an outstanding 2012 season in a reserve role has some Clemson fans rethinking McDowell’s value. Whether that translates to a satisfactory starting running back remains to be seen.

D.J. Howard suffered through an injury plagued sophomore season and has only seen 268 snaps over two seasons. Howard is more of a bruiser/pounder and not a breakaway threat on the level of Ellington or even McDowell.

2012 Running Back Experience Final

At times in 2012 Zac Brooks look over his skis, even against marginal competition, at other times Brooks acquitted himself well. By all accounts Brooks should have redshirted last season, but that was prevented by depth issues at the position. Not everyone agrees with my luke-warm assessment and I’m certainly no football talent scout, but I wonder if Brooks will ever contribute as more than a backup.

One side of this argument is that Brooks was only a true freshman, and I certainly get that angle. Spiller and Davis played as freshmen, Ellington, McDowell and Howard did not. It’s unfair to compare Brooks to the first two and it remains to be seen how he will ultimately compare to the other three.

McDowell’s sudden emergence as a redshirt junior should serve as a cautionary tale – players develop at different rates and Brooks may be a different player when August rolls around.

Not listed above are two 2013 commits that have yet to officially sign with Clemson. Neither are of the Davis/Spiller caliber and potentially face a redshirt in 2013 though depth may save one or both from that fate.

Rod McDowell – Unsung Hero

McDowell

Rod McDowell hadn’t made much of an impact in his first three years on campus. McDowell was part of Dabo Swinney’s first recruiting class, the tiny 2009 group that numbered just 12 individuals.

After redshirting that first year, McDowell played sparingly in his freshman and sophomore campaigns, seeing mostly mop up duty behind Andre Ellington, Mike Bellamy and D.J. Howard. McDowell rushed for only 224 yards combined in those first two years.

Through hard work, preserverance, injury and attrition 2012 has been a good year for McDowell. Bellamy transferred, Howard has been nicked up and Zac Brooks continues to be a work in progress.

With no reliable and experienced backup to Ellington the Tigers seemed a tad thin at running back. Seemed is the operative word. McDowell stepped up game after game and including the Chic-fil-A Bowl ended the season with 83 carries for 460 yards (5.5 per carry) and 5 touchdowns.

But more than mere statistics, McDowell did what was needed. Not only did McDowell take part of the load off Ellington, he did it with energy, passion and drive. In short, McDowell ran hard on every carry and played hard when he didn’t carry the ball.

One of the times McDowell didn’t carry the ball was on 4th and 16 with 1:32 to go last Monday night versus LSU.

As Tajh Boyd dropped back, Lamin Barrow, all 6’2, 232 lbs. of him, blitzed and was blowing by Clemson right guard Tyler Shatley. McDowell, started the play looking as if he intended to help right tackle Brandon Thomas, but appeared to see the streaking Barrow headed unimpeded towards Boyd and the end of the game.

McDowell

Barrow is not just a guy (JAG). He had 12 total tackles, including 2 for loss in this game. McDowell quickly veered left and cut Barrow just enough to give Boyd the time to get rid of the ball.

We all know what happened after that.

If McDowell doesn’t make that block, Boyd doesn’t make that pass, Nuk Hopkins doesn’t make that catch, Chandler Catanzaro doesn’t make that field goal and Clemson doesn’t win.

This is a stat focused site, sometimes too much so per my regular readers. Well, I’m here to tell you that no play and no stats accumulated by Rod McDowell in his first 3 years was bigger than that single block, a play for which his statistics were non-existent other than participation.

Lost in the beautiful spiral placed perfectly by Boyd and the sliding catch by Hopkins was the block of a lifetime by a 5’9, 195 lb. reserve running back that was just as important because without it the others never would have happened.

Sometimes I get lost in the statistics and miss the finer points of the game. I watched that play about 10 times before I noticed McDowell’s block.

Shame on me because it was a thing of beauty, just as pretty as a 40 yard spiral and a sliding catch on 4th and 16.

Looking Back – Game 9

A few notes compiled while watching Clemson dismantle Duke 56-20 and wonder how ESPN2 could bungle the broadcast any worse than that mess.

  • Yes, it was a blow out win that was never in doubt, but remember it was in game 9 last year that the turnover fest began for Clemson.  It will be interesting to see what happens this coming week against Maryland.
  • I believe it’s now law that anytime Martavis Bryant catches a pass it must be an explosive play and preferably a touchdown.  Unofficially in his career Bryant has 15 receptions for 405 yards (27 yards per catch) and 5 touchdowns.
  • More lapses in the defensive backfield.  Broken record.
  • Ellington’s injury didn’t look serious and McDowell and Howard looked ok, but the Tigers need #23.
  • Nuk Hopkins – 4 catches, 3 touchdowns.  Please show me 3 better wide receivers in the nation.

 

Looking Back – Game 8

Thoughts compiled while watching Clemson dismantle Wake Forest on Thursday night:

  • Nice to see you again, Sammy Watkins. Wow. 3 receptions of over 50 yards. School record for receiving yardage in a game.
  • Tajh Boyd has turned into a very effective runner gaining first downs on broken plays. Who would have thought that last year?
  • Martavis Bryant now has 364 yards and 4 touchdowns on 14 receptions – 26 yards per catch.
  • Like what I saw out of the defense for the most part, but where did those penalties come from? 9 penalties for 79 yards, most of the big ones on the defense.
  • Venables coaches to the very end, no matter what the score or game situation.
  • One area that I was not impressed with was the running game. I suggested yesterday that the offensive line should dominate Wake and that didn’t happen. Ellington’s longest run was 12 yards and he averaged 4.1 yards per carry. McDowell and Howard were not effective, either.
  • The left tackle spot concerns me a bit going forward.
  • Nice play by freshman Cortez Davis to cause a Wake fumble and not get noticed (in a bad way) during his first extensive playing time.
  • Good to see Bradley Pinion see some action both at punter and on kickoffs – he is after all the punter of the future and all 3 of Pinion’s kickoffs were touchbacks.
  • Adam Humphries as a shut down corner for a few plays. Really appreciate an unselfish player who will do whatever is asked to help the team.
  • When you don’t turn the ball over it is really difficult to lose with this Clemson offense.
  • 5 touchdowns in 6 red zone possessions = 5.83 points per possession.
  • Let’s be honest – Wake’s not good and their offensive line is banged up. Still 5 sacks is a pretty good night and Vic Beasley had 2 of those.
  • 8 games in Josh Watson has caused a fumble, recovered a fumble and blocked a kick.

Updated Rushing Stats

Despite quiet games against Ball State and Furman, Andre Ellington is averaging 103 yards per game.  At his current rate Ellington projects to 1,339 yards and 15/16 touchdowns (assuming 13 games).  Not a bad year, but not the number Ellington needs to become the all-time leading rusher.

Ellington didn’t play in the Georgia Tech game last year and that is an important factor in the Tigers favor on Saturday.

Assuming Sammy Watkins is back to 100% it’ll be interesting to see how he is used in the running this game, especially with the loss of D.J. Howard.  We saw Watkins line up in the backfield and run from a more conventional position several times against Florida State and I would expect to see more of that this week.


Rushing-Game 5

Rod McDowell also continues to contribute, benefitting the most from the injuries to Howard and the absence of Watkins.  McDowell’s 3 touchdowns on 21 carries is impressive and two of those weren’t necessarily cheap touchdowns, coming against Auburn and Boston College.

How McDowell is used this week with the absence of Howard and the return of Watkins is another interesting subplot and will be a window into the amount of trust the coaches have in him.

Of course, defenses now have to account for Tajh Boyd in the running game as Boyd has become a serious threat – just ask Boston College’s Steele Divitto.

 

Keep an eye on…

Andre Ellington

Andre Ellington

Andre Ellington or, more generally, the Clemson running game.

Yesterday I suggested that Ellington needed to approach 150 yards for the Tigers to be successful in Tallahassee on Saturday.  Maybe it’s not Ellington specifically, but the Tigers as a whole that need to reach that number.

Here are three quick facts:

  • In the Morris era Clemson is 9-1 when rushing for 150 yards or more.
  • In 3 of 4 Clemson losses in the Morris era Clemson has rushed for less than 100 yards.
  • In the Morris era Clemson is 0-3 in true road games when rushing for less than 100 yards.

Translation:  It’s not earth shattering news that Clemson needs to run the ball on Saturday.  Whether that’s Ellington (and Howard/McDowell) with a few selected runs from Boyd, or Sammy Watkins on the jet sweep is an open question.  But just remember, despite having Tajh Boyd’s arm, Nuk Hopkins and Sammy Watkins, the Clemson offense is designed to be an offense with a power running game and that needs to be on display in Tallahassee.

History indicates a one-dimensional Clemson loses.

Updated Rushing, Passing and Receiving Stats & FSU Thoughts

One of the bigger questions in Saturday’s Clemson vs. Florida State match up is can Clemson run the ball against the talented FSU defensive line?

My question is will we see the Andre Ellington of Auburn (228 yards) or the Andre Ellington of Ball State and Furman (100 yards combined)?

Obviously, blocking matters and we’ve been told that the Clemson offensive line is healthy despite injuries to Giff Timothy, David Beasley and Tyler Shatley at one time or another. It remains to be seen if this group can stay healthy and that’s important considering the drop off that occurs from the 1s to the 2s, with the possible exception of Shaq Anthony.

Rushing-Game 3

Ellington ran hard against Auburn, something that seemed to be dialed back a notch or two in the last two games. Perhaps that was by design and, if so, this is the week to dial back up.

Clemson needs Ellington to approach 150 yards rushing and also a few timely, well-placed runs from Boyd to have a chance.

The receiving stats are obviously skewed by the absence of Sammy Watkins for the first two games coupled with only 38 snaps against Furman.

Still the numbers, particularly for Nuk Hopkins, are eye-popping. Boyd to Hopkins has a completion ratio of 89.66%. Hopkins 68.97% successful play rate is also outstanding. Most of the other wide receiver numbers are pedestrian.

Receivers-Game 3

Brandon Ford can make the spectacular catch from the tight end position as evidenced by his touchdown against Furman, but a 60% completion ratio and two drops in 15 chances gives pause to the thought of targeting Ford more than 3 or 4 times in a game where every play is likely to be important.

The running backs have been non-existent in the passing game with the exception of a lone pass to D.J. Howard in game 2. That means they’ve been targeted 1 time in 113 passes. Could we see that change Saturday? I think so. Maybe not a lot, but it’s one more wrinkle for Morris to offer up.

Boyd’s been close to spectacular through three games, completing 73.26% of his passes with only 1 interception. There have been some close calls though and one wonders if, for example, the pass that Martavis Bryant snatched for a touchdown against Furman, would be an interception against the Seminoles. Those are the split second decisions that Boyd will have to excel at on the road in raucous and unfriendly atmosphere this week for the Tigers to be successful.

.

Passing Game 3

Breaking Down Short Yardage By Individual

Last week we looked at Clemson’s struggles on 3rd and 4th and short. This led me wonder how these numbers broke down by player. The results are shown below and I believe these numbers are instructive, albeit within a small sample size.

Clemson needs a power back on third down. It might be a healthy, stronger Andre Ellington, it might be D.J. Howard, or it might even be the 220 pound Tajh Boyd. Maybe Zac Brooks fills this role some day.

Short Yardage – Individual

It’s apparent though, that it wasn’t Ellington in 2011. A 56% success rate on 3rd and 1 is ample evidence of that. That number should be at least 75% and ideally higher. I’m sure I’ll hear about the offensive line woes, but if that’s true why were Boyd and Howard a combined 7 for 7 on third and 1? Maybe Boyd had an advantage because he’s typically not 7 yards deep, but what about Howard?

There is more to this than the offensive line or play calling.  Clemson needs to find a power back.

Analyzing Successful Play Ratios

What would you say if I told you that Sammy Watkins is Clemson’s most effective runner and 4th most effective receiver?

Nuts, I know.  There are, of course, limitations to the analysis below and there are many different ways to measure effectiveness, but one way to measure effectiveness is the successful vs. unsuccessful play results you see below.  I borrowed this concept from Chase Stuart of smartfootball.com.

The concept is straightforward, successful plays are measured thusly:

A successful rushing play:

  1. All carries count, except as noted in # 2 below.
  2. All instances of 3rd or 4th down carries where the player needed to gain more than 5 yards for a first down have been removed. As Stuart points out in his post it doesn’t feel right blaming the runner for not gaining 7 yards on 3rd and 7, so simply eliminate all of these failures from the data. However, on the rare occasions where a running back did convert for the first down, those plays were not removed. This does not happen often (only happened 14 times this season).
  3. For all 3rd or 4th downs, a success is defined as gaining the first down (and/or touchdown). A failure is every rush that does not gain a first down.
  4. On all downs, a first down (which includes a touchdown) is a success.
  5. On all second downs, a success is achieved when the player gains at least 50% of the yards needed for the first down. This means that 2nd-and-10 runs are failures unless they pick up 5 yards; on 2nd-and-7, the running back must gain at least 4 yards. A rush for one yard on and-and-3 is a failure, and so on.
  6. On first down, a running back is credited with a successful play if he gains at least 40% of the yards needed; therefore, four yards are required on 1st-and-10 before the running back is given credit. On 1st and goal from the 5, a two-yard gain would be considered a success.

A successful passing play:

  1. All pass attempts count.
  2. Sacks are counted as unsuccessful pass plays.
  3. For all 3rd or 4th downs, a success is defined as gaining the first down (and/or touchdown). A failure is every pass that does not gain a first down, whether completed or not.
  4. On all downs, a first down (which includes a touchdown) is a success.
  5. On all second downs, a success is achieved when the play gains at least 50% of the yards needed for the first down. This means that 2nd-and-10 passes are failures unless they pick up 5 yards; on 2nd-and-7, the pass must gain at least 4 yards. A pass for one yard on and-and-3 is a failure, and so on.
  6. On first down, a successful play is credited if it gains at least 40% of the yards needed; therefore, four yards are required on 1st-and-10 before the pass is successful. On 1st and goal from the 5, a two-yard gain would be considered a success.


Successful Plays 1.3

I’m more surprised at Ellington’s place in the rushing stats than I am of Watkins’ and I had no idea that D.J. Howard was so effective last year.

Humphries will likely get more opportunities this season, especially in the first two games, so it’ll be interesting to see how his numbers pan out in 2012.

The glaring elephant in the room is the production, or lack thereof, of the running backs in the passing game.  Between Ellington and Howard there were 43 pass plays, with only 7 (16.3%) being successful.  There simply has to be more production from this unit if the offense is going to continue to grow in 2012.

Analyzing Clemson’s 2012 Running Back Experience

One year ago the Tigers had a wealth of talent at the running back position. Andre Ellington was returning for his junior year, D.J. Howard and Demont Buice were redshirt freshmen ready to contribute, Rod McDowell was entering his sophomore season and 5 star stud Mike Bellamy was on the way.

One year later Buice has transferred, Bellamy is in junior college and the once rich position is in a somewhat precarious state. Almost 83% of the returning snaps come from one player and that player has been known to get dinged up (or worse) occasionally.

Ellington has superstar potential and Howard is a serviceable, steady back. After that the pickings are slim unless Rod McDowell suddenly becomes a threat.


Running Back Experience

The major concern is Ellington’s health. In 2010 he was injured and missed multiple games. He missed a full game in 2011 and parts of others while being nicked up. Howard has the potential to be a solid back, but he’s no Andre Ellington and the Tigers are a different team without Ellington.

This series is about returning experience so we’ll only mention Zac Brooks in passing here, but there is a real chance Brooks sees the field this year, perhaps in the role we say Mike Bellamy last year.

Instead of worrying about trying to get Ellington the school rushing record, the coaching staff should worry about keeping him healthy throughout the season.

Note: Darrell Smith came out of the spring as the only player listed at fullback on the roster, but is not included on the chart above as he has no prior experience at the position.